Anonymous
IS THIS CHEAP?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Waiting for the 256GB to go on sale…
3 months ago |
Anonymous
yes you can insert sd card and store videos locally. Subscription is optional. //@Anonymous: Can we not use the cloud storage for data?
5 months ago |
Anonymous
Can we not use the cloud storage for data?
5 months ago |
Anonymous
Thanks. I’ll give you $740 for yours. When can I pick up? //@anonymous: Bought it when it was 740 for 512g version.
5 months ago |
Anonymous
Bought it when it was 740 for 512g version.
6 months ago |
Anonymous
Arghhhh I just bought the 256 m4 version for 1,499 on att
8 months ago |
Anonymous
Cellular have to add another line. Use hot spot on your phone.
8 months ago |
Anonymous
It’s a deal
9 months ago |
Anonymous
RTX 4050 is a joke of a GPU, do not buy if you intend on gaming.
2 months ago |
limarcus
NO, I'm sorry to say, UPS shipping label is 4*6" and this model doesn't support that size //@anonymous: can I print a USPS shipping label with this? is the barcode good enough for USPS to read?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
can I print a USPS shipping label with this? is the barcode good enough for USPS to read?
3 years ago |
limarcus
all label printers use thermal transfer technology, no ink/toner consumption at all, the thermal transfer has the advantage of low consumable cost and fast printing, but the downside is considerably low printing resolution. And the thermal mechanism dominated most of its cost. This dual printer model should be used in a fast pace environment like takeout counter to double printer efficiency and at this price point, this one is unbeatable //@Anonymous: Market share? Fewer people buy these, I assume, which means lower demand to defray overhead. Also, I suspect the ink/toner is of a different, more expensive composition to account for the use, and the mechanisms must handle heavier media. Kind of makes sense to me, though I am no expert in ANY OF THESE FIELDS... //@Anonymous: Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Market share? Fewer people buy these, I assume, which means lower demand to defray overhead. Also, I suspect the ink/toner is of a different, more expensive composition to account for the use, and the mechanisms must handle heavier media. Kind of makes sense to me, though I am no expert in ANY OF THESE FIELDS... //@Anonymous: Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Wow… great dea
9 months ago |
Anonymous
Yea, 3070 is good but 10th gen is not //@anonymous: May be video card is worth the money? I just don't know prices in this technology sector because don't play video games or do cryptocurrency. //@Anonymous: 10th gen? Over priced
1 year ago |
Anonymous
May be video card is worth the money? I just don't know prices in this technology sector because don't play video games or do cryptocurrency. //@Anonymous: 10th gen? Over priced
1 year ago |
Anonymous
10th gen? Over priced
1 year ago |
dealsea.com
Order Summary
Items: $3,699.99
Shipping & handling: $0.00
Your Coupon Savings: -$500.00
Total before tax: $3,199.99
2 years ago |
Anonymous
yes //@Anonymous: Still has double click problem? //@Anonymous: gotta feel is to belive, I have MX Anywhere, not as good as this but wow
5 months ago |
Anonymous
Still has double click problem? //@Anonymous: gotta feel is to belive, I have MX Anywhere, not as good as this but wow
9 months ago |
Anonymous
gotta feel is to belive, I have MX Anywhere, not as good as this but wow
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Guys, there is a reason why FHD 27" are so cheap compare to FHD 23 or 24". While FHD 23-24" is acceptable but FHD 27" is horrific. Only novice users would buy FHD 27". Please goto Best Buy and bring up Wikipedia on a Web Browser and see the difference between FHD 23/24", FHD 27", and QHD 27". For the 13 y/o who doesn’t read, please go post your comment on TikTok because you are not contributing here.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Dude! Have you ever read anything on a 27" FHD monitor? Or compare how fonts look like between 27" FHD and 27" FHD. While it doesn't make much difference for 24" between FHD and QHD because you dont really need QHD on 24", but that extra 3" space make a huge difference. Fonts should be solid and black on 27" QHD but will appear lighter and fading on 27" FHD. I don't get it, why people rant when they dont know jack?? //@anonymous: Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
If anyone is wondering about purchasing this product for treating their dried cracked feet. This thing worked for me (M40). The 25% urea really helps . I see a lot of improvement after 2 weeks of non regular use. Just need to apply this and put socks on before going to bed. That is all I did.
1 week ago |
Anonymous
you choose only the ones that say prime! those are the premium ones where they will guarantee money back when as soon as you ship back your return!
1 year ago |
Anonymous
For cellphones, laptops, Amazon always has bad return services. They have been more and more greedy.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Amazon now has bad return service. I bought a laptop from amazon and it had huge noise. I returned it but seller didn't refund me. It took me half year and numerous calls and emails to get my money back. Amazon didn't help me during this painful process.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Not a very good deal //@Anonymous: price gouging?
1 week ago |
Anonymous
price gouging?
1 week ago |
Anonymous
Deal or no deal? Well, if you have space on your desk, I suggest spending a few bucks more and get 32-inch monitor. //@Anonymous: Deal?
6 months ago |
Anonymous
Deal?
6 months ago |